Add to ORKGWe find it somewhat unusual to have a book review essay reviewed by another scholar. But we are pleased that H-Diplo chose to accord our piece “Is Grand Strategy a Research Program? A Review Essay,” this honor. We are also pleased that Dr. Nina Silove chose to devote the time and effort to this task. Unfortunately, we believe that her review misrepresents the nature of our original essay and mistakes our central concerns. We neither claimed nor intended to offer a full-fledged Lakatosian analysis (or for that matter alternative positions on IR and the philosophy of science) of a grand strategy research program..
Raimo Tuomola has complained that my critical review of his The Philosophy of Sociality is superfici...
What good are book reviews? It seems that writing book reviews is an undervalued scholarly activity ...
Peer review is key in academic publishing, and rejection (or at least being asked to resubmit your p...
Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/68625/2/10.1177_009770047800400424.pd
Cross-Cultural Research Methods pretends to be a primer on the "how to" of conducting cross-cultural...
The following text is a response to the publication of the journal in the rubric “Philosophy and his...
Long ago, George Sarton set down criteria for reviewers. In addition to insisting on the need to com...
is the fundamental task of dissertation and research preparation. They claim that doctoral students ...
Literature reviews serve two basic functions: they provide information to non-specialists on work th...
The author reviews the book Creatively Undecided: Toward a History and Philosophy of Scientific Agen...
The production of 'systematic' reviews of research findings has recently come to be treated as a pri...
I was asked by IPMR to comment on the above article. As a prior blind reviewer of this article, I re...
Authors should always be so fortunate as to have such thoughtful and stimulating readings of one’s w...
Contrary to what I was taught in high school in the mid-1940s, science is no longer defined as an in...
Excerpt: I am pleased to respond to Alan Altany’s invitation to write this short piece on what I loo...
Raimo Tuomola has complained that my critical review of his The Philosophy of Sociality is superfici...
What good are book reviews? It seems that writing book reviews is an undervalued scholarly activity ...
Peer review is key in academic publishing, and rejection (or at least being asked to resubmit your p...
Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/68625/2/10.1177_009770047800400424.pd
Cross-Cultural Research Methods pretends to be a primer on the "how to" of conducting cross-cultural...
The following text is a response to the publication of the journal in the rubric “Philosophy and his...
Long ago, George Sarton set down criteria for reviewers. In addition to insisting on the need to com...
is the fundamental task of dissertation and research preparation. They claim that doctoral students ...
Literature reviews serve two basic functions: they provide information to non-specialists on work th...
The author reviews the book Creatively Undecided: Toward a History and Philosophy of Scientific Agen...
The production of 'systematic' reviews of research findings has recently come to be treated as a pri...
I was asked by IPMR to comment on the above article. As a prior blind reviewer of this article, I re...
Authors should always be so fortunate as to have such thoughtful and stimulating readings of one’s w...
Contrary to what I was taught in high school in the mid-1940s, science is no longer defined as an in...
Excerpt: I am pleased to respond to Alan Altany’s invitation to write this short piece on what I loo...
Raimo Tuomola has complained that my critical review of his The Philosophy of Sociality is superfici...
What good are book reviews? It seems that writing book reviews is an undervalued scholarly activity ...
Peer review is key in academic publishing, and rejection (or at least being asked to resubmit your p...